A supreme court nominee that thinks just being a Hispanic woman makes her more qualified than any white male. I quote "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life". She already shows her contempt for the constitution. What are her "rich experiences" that make her more qualified than a white male? What if the white male is a constitutional scholar and is color blind as justice is supposed to be? Where does she ever mention the constitution and if any of her findings are based on the constitution or her experiences as a Latina woman? What is it about those experiences that make her wise about the constitution? The law should be applied regardless of sex, color or ethnicity. Equal under the law is what matters. Lets see if the republicans have the balls to fight this racist woman on her racists beliefs. The Obama administration is throwing the constitution to the wind. I will watch from the shadows to see how the republicans address this. Will they stand on principles? Will they cower down to political correctness? We will see.
No comments:
Post a Comment